Well, the primary is finally over, thank God. Congrats to Sen. Obama on a great win and a spectacularly run campaign. It was a tough battle between two highly qualified Democrats, and although I didn't have any trouble picking Barack Obama as my candidate, I will commend Senator Clinton for her tenacity and continue to admire the work she's done and will do in the US Senate. The thing about the Dem primary, contentious as it was, was that there were two formidable candidates, both with weighty resumes and strong ideas for how they plan to move the country forward. Neither candidate was perfect, but I believe we chose wisely and we have a great nominee in Barack Obama, who will crush John McCain in November.
There are other contests to consider, though, and a lot of good Democrats running for Congress this year, so it's important that we choose strong candidates to increase our slim majority in both the House and Senate.
|
|
JK meets with constituents outside Faneuil Hall
|
One contest that I'm following closely of course is Senator Kerry's reelection to the Senate, and believe it or not, he has a primary challenger. Sort of. What's odd, though, is the platform Ed O'Reilly is running on. I think he calls it "I'm not John Kerry". You know, when you're a former chairman of the school committee who had to quit because he couldn't find the time, and you're running against the 12th most powerful person in the United States Senate, you might want to come up with something that would give folks a reason to vote for you. Unless there isn't one. In Mr. O'Reilly's case, there isn't. And I visited his website just to make sure.
Environmental Protection
O'Reilly's website has three short paragraphs on the environment, most of it referencing Al Gore's work. Obviously Ed is not John Kerry, who has written a book, represented the United States at international climate conferences, and written and/or co-sponsored hundreds of pieces of legislation dealing with environmental issues.
O'Reilly's "Record of Public Service" page is much broader than his environmental dossier, filling four entire paragraphs. I will summarize.
Paragraph 1 - Ed is not John Kerry
Paragraph 2 - Ed was a Gloucester City Councilor in the 1980s
Paragraph 3 - Ed was chairman of the Gloucester School Committee in the 1990s (doesn't say that he quit)
Paragraph 4 - Ed is known to have a sense of humor
I guess he does have a sense of humor. He's attempting to run for Senate against John Kerry with absolutely no record to back up his stated positions.
Good one, Ed.
|
EOR skulks behind column at Faneuil Hall after Kerry speech
|
Most of the rest of the site is about how Ed O'Reilly 'believes' this or 'supports' that, with nothing to back it up. Apparently, he believes education is good and war is bad. OK, that ought to sell, it's the position of most Americans. There is nothing, though, to suggest he is any more qualified to represent Massachusetts in the United States Senate than any other former city council person/school board member currently on vacation from his day job as a lawyer.
Really. Nothing. So, if you want to know what Ed O'Reilly has done to back up his stated positions on 'things people like', you really have to dig a little deeper than his campaign site.
Here's some background on Ed O'Reilly from BMG poster 'Masshole':
Ed may be a defender of the Constitution but he's made his living (a good enough living to take a year off to run for Senate) defending drunk drivers, drug dealers and thugs. Everyone deserves competent legal representation but Ed isn't a public defender. He's a self-employed defense attorney who picks his own clients and then makes money off them. Here is my fav Ed client.
* George Sideris - Peabody cop who beat his elderly mother and then was arrested when he went a bit far and threw her down the stairs on Thanksgiving. Ed defended Sideris and said that
the reason George punched his 73-year old mom in the face and then tossed her down the stairs was because George was being teased at work.
* Ed says that he has worked hard to help people with substance abuse problems and spoke about helping kids stay off drugs when he was a one term Gloucester school committee member. So imagine my surprise when I found that in 1988, Ed was defending a member of a drug smuggling operation. The foursome was stopped on the Pike and police found the car loaded with heroin. Ed was trying to get the search thrown out. Oh, guess where the drugs were headed...Gloucester.
True story.
There's more, but you get the picture.
It's the topic 'deplorable things done at Thanksgiving' that brings me, finally, to my introduction to Ed O'Reilly on DailyKos. Mr. O'Reilly, in late November of last year, chose to side with the SwiftBoat Liars in questioning Sen. Kerry's military service. The blogs, of course, reacted and a diary went up on Kos criticizing Mr. O'Reilly for questioning the service of a decorated veteran. Ed showed up to mount a defense, posted one sanctimonious comment titled "Ed O'Reilly Responds" in which he asked for "honest and open dialogue",and then quickly disappeared to enjoy the holiday, leaving his poor friend Ron to try to defend the indefensible. He never answered any of the questions posed to him, including the one about his not having served in Vietnam, or about his criticism of Ted Kennedy's work on children's health care, or even why he was siding with SwiftBoaters and not his fellow Democrat. You know, when someone questions a veteran's service, I immediately think of something said by a Republican veteran recently, that "The only person who has a right to question someone with three Purple Hearts is someone with four Purple Hearts." Ed doesn't have them. Although he was 'of age', he chose not to serve. OK, no problem there, except when one chooses not to serve, he gives up the right to criticize others' service, as we are reminded by that wise Republican vet.
I don't doubt that veteran would have had some choice words for Ed O'Reilly, although there are some Republicans who do seem to like him. They like him so much, in fact, that they are donating big money to his campaign. You would think that a 'true progressive' like Ed O'Reilly wouldn't get big donations from heavy Republican contributors, including backers of Mitt Romney, Bradley Jones, Kerry Healey and John Tierney's 2004 opponent what's-his-name, but he has, oddly enough. Why would folks who previously donated to Republicans suddenly give money to Ed? Oh, right. He's 'Not John Kerry', and I'm pretty sure they would love to run against someone who is not John Kerry this fall.
But the question remains, what is Ed running ON? Someone must know. It has to be something more than "I'm not John Kerry" and a couple grand from Republicans.
Check your gauge, Ed. It's hovering around 'E'.